Context: modern America.
The desire for constants is.. hairy at best. Looking at the political side of America, most people want someone that is constant. Someone that doesn't have wishy-washy feelings about, potentially, important issues. Most people want someone that can back their position with years of documentation. If a public servant or representative has flippant tenancies, he or she is demonized as indecisive or even being bribed.
I am succumb to supposition.
Most people want fluidity, honestly. How mundane is monotony?
Just not in government.
But what about in relationships? Do we crave a solid, everlasting relationship with people? A never-changing status of positive or negative?
Humans are not meant to be static.
Our relationships are not meant to be static.
There are too many examples in nature that support fluidity, change, adaption, evolution, etc..
Is the concept of an anchor in reality simply a manifestation of fear and worry?
I admit to being fundamentally prone to anxiety. Its is, at times, physically debilitating.
And for what? Fear of losing control? Fear of not knowing what might happen in the future? Fear of taking risks, of failure?
Damn right.
Right or wrong, it is in my core to worry. And I seek to make this change.
No comments:
Post a Comment